Comments

Scoble…stealing from the rich?

What I was using to hit Facebook

Well, I guess you’ve probably heard the latest in the ongoing egofest that is Robert Scoble. To cut a long story short for those not in the know, Robert used an automated script to scrape data from Facebook, the social networking site. This (top secret) script had been provided by Plaxo, another company involved with social networking sites. Surprise suprise, Robert gets rumbled and has his Facebook account removed. Does Robert accept that he broke Facebooks’ Term of Service and having his account removed was fair punishment? hahahahahahahahaha! Not when there’s pages of self promoting blogroll to be written….

The main problem I and a few others have with this is that Robert seems to think that breaking Facebooks’ ToS is fine and that he should be allowed to take ‘his’ data whereever he likes. Why does he want this data? (names, email address and birthdays apparently) Could it be that he’s trying to create his own mailing list? If he wants to contact these people then why not simply use the built in features of Facebook? Robert has often mentioned that he will accept anyone as his friend on Facebook, and this probably holds true in real life as well, and so I suspect that there’s a fair percentage of his 5,000 friends than are simply fanboys that have signed up, simply to have Robert as one of their friends. All rather teenage if you ask me. The point though is that did Robert ask permission of these 5,000 people if he could use there data outside of Facebook and 3rd party applications? It doesn’t appear so.

I think this video by Loren Feldman from 1938 Media sums it up nicely…

Video Link

Comments
Videos

Comments (18359)

Permalink

…I’m not leaving!

Steve Ballmer still doesn’t understand social networking

Hmmm, tricky one this as it’s my first post although I’m sure I’ll get the hang of it eventually. Anyway, on with the show…

Now, from Scobles’ comments it appears that he is of the opinion that Microsoft doesn’t want to get involved with all of this Web 2.0 stuff because there’s no ‘business value’. I think that as this is my first post we should start by defining some terms here. For me, Web 2.0 isn’t simply a social networking site, it’s simply something that uses AJAX. There have been Web 2.0 sites around for ages, it just took the marketing guys a while to come up with a fancy name and get the venture capitalists excited again.

On to the meat of his comment though, and that’s Scobles’ amazement and frustration that Microsoft hasn’t responded to ‘WordPress, Flickr, Skype, YouTube, or any of the other things over the years and the suggestion that Microsft just doesn’t get it. Now, for a start, Microsoft knows what it is and what it isn’t. It isn’t a name that all the cool kids are going to go running to if they try and bring out a Facebook killer called MSpuff or whatever. For every Youtube or Flickr there are countless other imitators and it takes a certain amount of luck as well as a decent product to be crowned king. Fashion labels have been trying to discover why people flock to a certain brand or what makes those shoes ‘cool’ only to run into a brick wall every time, and I think Steve Ballmer tried to explain that with his quote:

 “I think these things [social networks] are going to have some legs, and yet there’s a faddishness, a faddish nature about anything that basically appeals to younger people,”

I don’t see why Scoble thinks that Microsoft should be able to pull out some secret sauce and invent the killer app 2.0 or why they should even try - that’s not the business they’re in. As pointed out in the comments on his own page, Facebook is simply this years MySpace,Second Life,etc and people will find something else sometime soon. And Scobles’ insistence that he’s not leaving as he has 5,000 friends on Facebook is laughable. He’s mentioned many times that he will accept friend invites from anyone that asks so I can’t really see the lost business potential if 4,900 people are unable to write on his wall with their inane posts. The other 100 people probably have his cell number anyway or are members of his family. Scobles’ comment:

“Also, Facebook is now a business card collection. A rolodex.”

..sums it up quite nicey. How many people do you know that still use a rolodex? Or a Filofax? Remember them?

In short, it would seem that Scoble is the one that doesn’t quite get social networking. I admit, he’s very good at self promotion but there’s a subtle difference between the two. Once Scoble and everyone else realises that Facebook is a modern day Emperors’ New Clothes and there’s nothing to do there after signing up and stalking a few people apart from poke each other, they’ll be asking for something with a bit more meat and will swarm to The Next Big Thing.



 

Comments

Comments (1292)

Permalink